13 replies to this topic

[Slizer]

.iStun*Hide&S server is shown on the Infiltration server list but not on the H&S list.

Edited by Slizer, 28 September 2009 - 07:47 PM.

[l'ANGELINOOO `]

pro's!

[azøte]

Maybe they are using RSI mod...

Btw from what I see sK [Hide&Seek] aint there aswell.

[max]

The non coloured hostname must contain either "h&s" or the words "hide" and "seek" to be shown in that serverlist.

[Slizer]

Maybe they are using RSI mod...

Btw from what I see sK [Hide&Seek] aint there aswell.

The server is hosted by 2k3, they're not using RSI.

The non coloured hostname

What do you mean by this?

Edited by Slizer, 29 September 2009 - 09:21 AM.

[max]

What do you mean by this?

For example if you use "^7hide^5&^7seek" in the hostname, non coloured it will be "hide&seek". The scripts checks whether the non coloured hostname has either "h&s" or both of the words "hide" and "seek".

[Slizer]

For example if you use "^7hide^5&^7seek" in the hostname, non coloured it will be "hide&seek". The scripts checks whether the non coloured hostname has either "h&s" or both of the words "hide" and "seek".

Well? They have "Hide" like my server RPM "Hide"&Seek ?

[BariS]

What max tries to say is. You have to either have H&S with the ^ filtered (colors) or BOTH the words Hide/Seek so not only Hide or Seek. I guess max could change the script and also add servers who only have Hide OR Seek in it. But imagine there is a clan called "Seeking Soldiers" (w/e bullshit name) then also this will be listen in the Hide&Seek list. So that's the only fucked up part.

[Slizer]

Max, wouldn't it be better to read the current gametype the server is running?

like gametype inf, gametype ctf, gametype h&s

[max]

Max, wouldn't it be better to read the current gametype the server is running?

like gametype inf, gametype ctf, gametype h&s

That's what I wanted to do, and that's why I added the "current_gametype" CVAR to the serverinfo. In short: it ultimately didn't work, so I used the hostname instead (stop reading here if you don't want to know the technical details ). Problem is that, when pinging servers for the serverlist, the "getinfo" packet is used, rather than the "getstatus" packet, because the "getinfo" packet is much smaller, which makes it faster and uses less traffic. The "getinfo" packet only contains standard CVARs (sv_maxclients, sv_hostname etc) while the "getstatus" packet contains the full list of players and CVARs (including the "current_gametype" CVAR).

[Slizer]

That's what I wanted to do, and that's why I added the "current_gametype" CVAR to the serverinfo. In short: it ultimately didn't work, so I used the hostname instead (stop reading here if you don't want to know the technical details ). Problem is that, when pinging servers for the serverlist, the "getinfo" packet is used, rather than the "getstatus" packet, because the "getinfo" packet is much smaller, which makes it faster and uses less traffic. The "getinfo" packet only contains standard CVARs (sv_maxclients, sv_hostname etc) while the "getstatus" packet contains the full list of players and CVARs (including the "current_gametype" CVAR).

Hahahaha, stopped reading

[BariS]

Well then max make it use read sv_hostname. With this you should not have this problem, because in the sv_hostname you can read the full length of the servername no matter how long it is, it's in the serverlist where it doesn't fit.

[max]

Well then max make it use read sv_hostname. With this you should not have this problem, because in the sv_hostname you can read the full length of the servername no matter how long it is, it's in the serverlist where it doesn't fit.

Yeah, that's exactly what I did. Not very pretty, but works in most cases -- apparently not all!

[Slizer]