112 replies to this topic

[Butcher]

Group D is the failgroup

[insane]

updated

[project]

We played 3 matches not 2..

Like we said we will rematch the war vs e. but only when they get more then 10 points in the 2nd match...
Else we dont see any reason to rematch it because we got better things to do.. (not trying to be arrogant, we all realy got better things to do like school and work)

I hope the 2nd match vs e. will be a good one tho.

[phil]

öhm daan and thats not right. we didnt clear it up yet. as much as i saw most arent for a rematch even if they are better in 2nd match

[project]

Check cc forum phil

[scit]

We played 3 matches not 2..

Like we said we will rematch the war vs e. but only when they get more then 10 points in the 2nd match...
Else we dont see any reason to rematch it because we got better things to do.. (not trying to be arrogant, we all realy got better things to do like school and work)

I hope the 2nd match vs e. will be a good one tho.

that seems pretty fair. iill try to get us 11 points instead

[insane]

We played 3 matches not 2..

Like we said we will rematch the war vs e. but only when they get more then 10 points in the 2nd match...
Else we dont see any reason to rematch it because we got better things to do.. (not trying to be arrogant, we all realy got better things to do like school and work)

I hope the 2nd match vs e. will be a good one tho.

I decided that your war doesn't count. You cant say that e. will get a FF just because you want to play. The deadline is in 3 weeks not next week so you got time enough to play a 5v5

[blue]

asshole

[project]

Ehm they agreed playing us, so therefore its not our fold that they played 4 on 5. They should have known we could play it another time + they already agreed on my idea:

QUOTE (project @ Nov 4 2009, 12:35 PM) *
We played 3 matches not 2..
Like we said we will rematch the war vs e. but only when they get more then 10 points in the 2nd match...
Else we dont see any reason to rematch it because we got better things to do.. (not trying to be arrogant, we all realy got better things to do like school and work)

I hope the 2nd match vs e. will be a good one tho.

QUOTE (scit @ Nov 4 2009, 12:24 PM) *
that seems pretty fair. iill try to get us 11 points instead

So please insane dont let us play them 3!!!! times (A)

[Richard]

What you mean you only want to play it if they can get more than 10 points? Other clans don't refuse to play cC neither when they win from cC right?

[Junior]

I decided that your war doesn't count. You cant say that e. will get a FF just because you want to play. The deadline is in 3 weeks not next week so you got time enough to play a 5v5

good decision.

[project]

What you mean you only want to play it if they can get more than 10 points? Other clans don't refuse to play cC neither when they win from cC right?

we played them the first match and won 20-3. it was a 4 on 5 cuz they dident have 5 on eventhough they kept telling us for almost an hour that they did.
So officialy this war counts and we just have to play e. one more time since we all have to play eachother twice.

But because we are totally happy about the way things went we decided we would play the match again but only if the 2nd match versus e. will be a normal 5 on 5 and only if e. will get more then 10 point the second war.

why?
Because we dont see any reason in playing e. 3 times after we won them in the first two matches pretty hard. Like I said we got others things to do to and winning a clan 3 times pretty hard is for some of us a waste of time.

But if e. get more then 10 points in the 2nd war its clear they are in our eyes worth playing a re-match. Cuz its proves they can do better in a normal 5 on 5.

So actually it was more of an "noble deed" from cc to suggest this 10 point rule since we dont have any reason to re-match it.

But insane decided it was our fold that they made us wait for 3 hours and so we have to re match vs e. again.

[blue]

Yes, it was totally our fault that they warred r2v during the original arranged time instead of us.
And yes, it was totally our fault when they said they had 5 around 2hrs after the original arranged time, which they obviously didn't.

[ind0steelo]

update the groups pl0x

[doctorfunk]

good decision Insane

[ind0steelo]

Thommy, how's the system gonna be for the 1/4, 1/2, finales?

[scit]

we played them the first match and won 20-3. it was a 4 on 5 cuz they dident have 5 on eventhough they kept telling us for almost an hour that they did.
So officialy this war counts and we just have to play e. one more time since we all have to play eachother twice.

But because we are totally happy about the way things went we decided we would play the match again but only if the 2nd match versus e. will be a normal 5 on 5 and only if e. will get more then 10 point the second war.

why?
Because we dont see any reason in playing e. 3 times after we won them in the first two matches pretty hard. Like I said we got others things to do to and winning a clan 3 times pretty hard is for some of us a waste of time.

But if e. get more then 10 points in the 2nd war its clear they are in our eyes worth playing a re-match. Cuz its proves they can do better in a normal 5 on 5.

So actually it was more of an "noble deed" from cc to suggest this 10 point rule since we dont have any reason to re-match it.

But insane decided it was our fold that they made us wait for 3 hours and so we have to re match vs e. again.

Project... We will forfeit if we wont get more than 10 points next match. good?

[insane]

Project... We will forfeit if we wont get more than 10 points next match. good?

I don't recall you being an admin of this cup. The game doesn't count and you have to play cC again and that result will count, no matter what.

[insane]

Thommy, how's the system gonna be for the 1/4, 1/2, finales?

1st A vs 2nd D
1st D vs 2nd A

1st B vs 2nd C
1st C vs 2nd B

[woutinho`]

Project... We will forfeit if we wont get more than 10 points next match. good?

ROFLMAO @ FORFAIT