Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cC. vs -HaZe-
#41
Posted 13 December 2009 - 10:49 PM
but i think since gzuz knows andi good and knows he didnt hax, so he will give us this win
#42
Posted 13 December 2009 - 10:50 PM
#44
Posted 13 December 2009 - 10:56 PM
But we just played a nice friendly game versus -HaZe- . This was nice and there was nothing wrong. But then this guide gets posted you we will you know what kind of whine and rulles, forfeit treaths or rematches.. Why would u post it, this only makde a flamewar, cuz haze doesnt seem to give a crap about it.
And windows for the record, I hate the records rules here to, Its just I cant come up with better rules then the one we got now.
#45
Posted 13 December 2009 - 10:56 PM
Edited by F!r3, 13 December 2009 - 11:01 PM.
#46
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:01 PM
This reminds me of dads team tournament where we also won haze but they took the ff because we used priest (while priest was in avelgem for ages but just not registered in the cuplineup)Why would u post it, this only makde a flamewar, cuz haze doesnt seem to give a crap about it.
http://avelgem.av.fu...e...ls&cwID=109
But like i said before, i hope haze won't be lame and take the ff (alltough they did it to us)

2008 - The Great katana Cup - sK.
2009 - Noobroom Clan tournament - 3v.
2009 - Facing Worlds - 3v.
2010 - Demobase INF Team Cup III - Avelgem
2010 - Demobase INF Open Cup VI - Ks.
2010 - Demobase Nations Cup V - Belgium
2014 - SOFII demo 2014 Cup - Avelgem
#48
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:02 PM
priest didn't hack either thothe point isnt if andi/milkman is a cheater. i think no1 thinks about him hackin in wars

2008 - The Great katana Cup - sK.
2009 - Noobroom Clan tournament - 3v.
2009 - Facing Worlds - 3v.
2010 - Demobase INF Team Cup III - Avelgem
2010 - Demobase INF Open Cup VI - Ks.
2010 - Demobase Nations Cup V - Belgium
2014 - SOFII demo 2014 Cup - Avelgem
#49
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:04 PM
No, I already noticed that the point is recording clanwars. I remember drnknmnky got a 6 months ban because he didn't sent the record of a mixwar, and the only thing the admin said was "life is harsh". So why should milkman be treated different?the point isnt if andi/milkman is a cheater. i think no1 thinks about him hackin in wars
#50
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:05 PM
#51
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:11 PM
I doubt Haze would take the forfeit, in the dads teamcup someone else played, priest, instead of 'lucifer', Priest was a matchdeciding factor, holding roof with his sniper
+ Jet did record on the red side, just forgot the blue side, i think.
Let's end this post with a quote:
cc deserved the win they were much much better then us, good teamplay and some nice aiming.
#52
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:12 PM
Rules r rules. cC's problem their clanmate didnt record and put them on a risk. Never recording means no accident. You know the risks if u don't follow the rules, its written all over here. No punishments-->no equalization-->protest-->fall of demobase' policy
#53
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:14 PM
He recorded red side, just forgot the blue side i think.
Jet li doesnt give a crap about recording, he never does and he never will. He plays the game and I never seen him cheating or whatsoever. He was on fairplay this round and ofcourse he never records cuz his record has never been asked.
#54
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:14 PM
we and lots of other people got in shit for new rules, bans, cupbans and shit so it would be stupid and unfair to make exceptions. i have nothing against u all, but everyone's equal, and i don't care what happens now, its up to doctorfunk/insane/haze to decide.
So because u got in shit for the new rules we all should to?Doesnt make sense unless u just like it to get us into trouble.
#55
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:14 PM
Sure, but be on fairplay while doing it.I just wanna hack in every single war without punishments and records, too bad I am still dreaming.
Rules r rules. cC's problem their clanmate didnt record and put them on a risk. Never recording means no accident. You know the risks if u don't follow the rules, its written all over here. No punishments-->no equalization-->protest-->fall of demobase' policy
Has there been requested any record of a guy on fairplay (not talking nonamers here) for hacking (so not wallbug,barrelcamping or follow id)... Don't think so.
You don't always have to handle by the textbook to stay in control of a situation. Just went to a footballmatch where the referee tottally killed the match cuz of that for instance.
example from this cup:
Should ros have been able to play r2v by the rules? No.
+ Like the admin said, nothing suspicious from jetli during the war. Think his judgement carries some weight aswell since he was chosen by cupadmins and both teams to lead this war.
#57
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:16 PM
just stfu for real the most of avelgem needs to be fokt irl!we and lots of other people got in shit for new rules, bans, cupbans and shit so it would be stupid and unfair to make exceptions. i have nothing against u all, but everyone's equal, and i don't care what happens now, its up to doctorfunk/insane/haze to decide.
vieze kk mensen zijn jullie
SECONDARY DNC IV U/VDTCHBLS [
#58
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:17 PM
just stfu for real the most of avelgem needs to be fokt irl!
vieze kk mensen zijn jullie
dont flame me
There is no 'ctrl' button on fastcolts computer. Fastcolt is always in control.
anyways, even though I'm not a pokerwhore like fastcolt, that's what I do the most also, betting small to check what others do
but in this situation, fastcolt > me, listening to him is like asking a crackjunk how to use crack, u can trust it
#60
Posted 13 December 2009 - 11:19 PM
butcher did his job as an admin and took the fairshot, theres nothin wrong at it
i find it weird to see cc guys flaming avelgem just because their own member didnt record (which is actually weird aswell, guy who has played from the beginning doesnt record wars/cupwars?)
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












