34 replies to this topic

[krazzerous]

Maybe if half of you wouldn't bring it up in the first place then there would be no argument. Whether it's playing around or not. If the "full players" would come and say demo sucks troloohlo you guys would get defensive as well. This is a SOF forum now, if you have a problem with it then build a bridge and get the fuck over it.

[Butcher]

Ya'll start to sound depressed that demo is dying and full is just too ownage and taking over everyone and everything.

Welcome to Demobase.eu

demo will always be better then full

and by that i don't mean only the game, but also the players

[heldro]

demo'ers and fullers will allways stay natural enemies i guess.

Full is way better anyway tbfh...

[Museki]

EY STFU nabs

any offers plox meh!

[Slizer]

But it's obvious that full players are better at full and demo players better at demo, still not impossible for demo players to win a full scrim and full players to win a demo scrim.

Both versions are unique for its own reasons and for different tastes. We're all sof players, playing the same game but different version, although that doesn't take out the fact that demo is still just a demo and not the full game like "Silver" and Gold. What ever,

aMeX who imo has one of the best demo players, can easily own us fullers in a scrim cause they've played plenty of wars on full now. It's no doubt, they are 1337, but I'm pretty sure if the best players from CST and RTS for example, made a team in demo and adapted themselves, they would've been able to rape your asses as well as amex are able to do on full nowadays. And it's harder to adapt from 3rd to 1st (full to demo) than 1st to 1st for a different version (demo to full).

It's all pretty logic, but deep down, all who say that demo is better, and the players are better, you can't really prove that. Different versions, different game plays. Still just the same goddamn game, so there's no idea that we fight about it. Pointless.

I'm a bit off-topic now but I've said gl to museki. Hope you find a clan m8. Shouldn't be too hard since there are around 15-20 clans on INF. Maybe 10-15 "very" active. I included those 1 week clans.

Edited by Slizer, 14 September 2010 - 05:06 PM.

[Museki]

Can play few wars tonight so whoever is interested can add my msn: michaelmeisman@hotmail.com ; wacko laat maar weten als je wil warren vnvd

[Museki]

BUMP Still looking for a decent clan to play with!
Been playing at 1fx server, under the name 'tw1ztd' lately!

[Altidore]

Gl

[P4P3R]

FUCK THERES A MOSQUITO IN MY ROOM

[HighNesZ]

Maybe you can scrim with us sometime and see what happens.

[bing bang blaow]

But it's obvious that full players are better at full and demo players better at demo, still not impossible for demo players to win a full scrim and full players to win a demo scrim.

Both versions are unique for its own reasons and for different tastes. We're all sof players, playing the same game but different version, although that doesn't take out the fact that demo is still just a demo and not the full game like "Silver" and Gold. What ever,

aMeX who imo has one of the best demo players, can easily own us fullers in a scrim cause they've played plenty of wars on full now. It's no doubt, they are 1337, but I'm pretty sure if the best players from CST and RTS for example, made a team in demo and adapted themselves, they would've been able to rape your asses as well as amex are able to do on full nowadays. And it's harder to adapt from 3rd to 1st (full to demo) than 1st to 1st for a different version (demo to full).

It's all pretty logic, but deep down, all who say that demo is better, and the players are better, you can't really prove that. Different versions, different game plays. Still just the same goddamn game, so there's no idea that we fight about it. Pointless.

I'm a bit off-topic now but I've said gl to museki. Hope you find a clan m8. Shouldn't be too hard since there are around 15-20 clans on INF. Maybe 10-15 "very" active. I included those 1 week clans.

wow?
demo players have to:
* get used to 3rders raping them behind benches
* no falldamage(new tactics)
* knife throwing range
* new movement(jumping, leaning)
* playing 4on4 for most of the time instead of 5o5(new tactics)
* a slightly modified map
* gun behaviour (diff recoil, overpowered shotgun, etc)
* faster speed (300 or 290, instead of demos 280) meanin u have to adjust ur aim


so dont go around saying its easy for us to come from one game to another when the changes are quite big


and no, ur game isnt the real game.



GOLD is.
1.00 is broken, and demo, is simply demo; as you said it urself
we are both playing incomplete version of the game so dont tell anyone to come to the real game.

Edited by rocket, 27 October 2010 - 06:25 AM.

[t0xic]

owned

[HighNesZ]

The real game is the game you can buy in the store from the release.

demo just a demo of a real game. When a real game is broken the make a update on it and not a new game.

demo = demo
full = real game
gold = update / patch

But I have to admit playing vs 3rd is harder as playing 1st vs 1st so coming from demo to full is harder as from full to demo.

annyway stay to the topic or create a topic to bitch about this stupid shit.

[bing bang blaow]

The real game is the game you can buy in the store from the release.

demo just a demo of a real game. When a real game is broken the make a update on it and not a new game.

demo = demo
full = real game
gold = update / patch

But I have to admit playing vs 3rd is harder as playing 1st vs 1st so coming from demo to full is harder as from full to demo.

annyway stay to the topic or create a topic to bitch about this stupid shit.

why does ur game need a patch in the first place? because its broken(demo function just to name something) and not complete


SIMPLE

Edited by rocket, 27 October 2010 - 07:59 AM.