Hello,
Based on a routine review of your account which indicated unusual play patterns, we have started a more detailed review of your account and play. At this point we must ask that you provide us with some information that will help us to resolve this issue.
First, please explain in detail, any relationship you have with the following player/s:
'FrogOnAcid88'
'Tope90'
'i r d0nk'
Next, please review the hands copied below and explain your strategy and thinking during the play of the hands.
Your account privileges have been suspended pending the outcome of our review. Playing on PokerStars during this time will cause any such account to be closed and the funds therein confiscated. Please respond fully and completely within 48 hours. Your cooperation will help to bring the matter to a close promptly.
Regards,
Kiet
PokerStars Game Security Team
PokerStars Game #79453857192: Tournament #552040397, $6.37+$0.63 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2012/04/25 21:50:43 ET
Table '552040397 2' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 (10552 in chips)
Seat 6: ECV1899 (6578 in chips)
Seat 8: LolUgotOwnd (6472 in chips)
Seat 9: Vayshravana (3398 in chips)
FrogOnAcid88: posts small blind 100
ECV1899: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to LolUgotOwnd [2h Qh]
LolUgotOwnd: raises 200 to 400
Vayshravana: calls 400
LolUgotOwnd said, "everybody in"
FrogOnAcid88: calls 300
ECV1899: calls 200
*** FLOP *** [5h Kh Ac]
FrogOnAcid88: bets 704
ECV1899: folds
LolUgotOwnd: calls 704
Vayshravana: folds
*** TURN *** [5h Kh Ac] [4h]
FrogOnAcid88: checks
LolUgotOwnd: bets 1000
FrogOnAcid88: calls 1000
*** RIVER *** [5h Kh Ac 4h] [Th]
FrogOnAcid88: checks
FrogOnAcid88 said, "checking would be good"
LolUgotOwnd: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
FrogOnAcid88: shows [7d Ah] (a flush, Ace high)
LolUgotOwnd: shows [2h Qh] (a flush, King high)
FrogOnAcid88 collected 5008 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 5008 | Rake 0
Board [5h Kh Ac 4h Th]
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 (small blind) showed [7d Ah] and won (5008) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 6: ECV1899 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 8: LolUgotOwnd showed [2h Qh] and lost with a flush, King high
Seat 9: Vayshravana (button) folded on the Flop
PokerStars Game #79091571825: Tournament #548905649, $1.39+$0.11 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level V (40/80) - 2012/04/18 20:16:35 ET
Table '548905649 1' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 (1267 in chips)
Seat 2: Paulomedeiro (308 in chips)
Seat 3: SinaloaFTW (318 in chips)
Seat 5: Tope90 (997 in chips)
Seat 7: LolUgotOwnd (1018 in chips)
Seat 9: kingplot (592 in chips)
FrogOnAcid88: posts the ante 8
Paulomedeiro: posts the ante 8
SinaloaFTW: posts the ante 8
Tope90: posts the ante 8
LolUgotOwnd: posts the ante 8
kingplot: posts the ante 8
LolUgotOwnd: posts small blind 40
kingplot: posts big blind 80
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to LolUgotOwnd [Kc As]
FrogOnAcid88: raises 1179 to 1259 and is all-in
Paulomedeiro: folds
SinaloaFTW: folds
Tope90: folds
LolUgotOwnd: folds
kingplot: folds
Uncalled bet (1179) returned to FrogOnAcid88
FrogOnAcid88 collected 248 from pot
FrogOnAcid88:
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 248 | Rake 0
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 collected (248)
Seat 2: Paulomedeiro folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: SinaloaFTW folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Tope90 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: LolUgotOwnd (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: kingplot (big blind) folded before Flop
PokerStars Game #79401894763: Tournament #551589585, $6.45+$0.55 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (200/400) - 2012/04/24 20:52:46 ET
Table '551589585 1' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 4: LolUgotOwnd (7738 in chips)
Seat 5: sutjo650 (3619 in chips)
Seat 7: FrogOnAcid88 (2143 in chips)
LolUgotOwnd: posts the ante 25
sutjo650: posts the ante 25
FrogOnAcid88: posts the ante 25
FrogOnAcid88: posts small blind 200
LolUgotOwnd: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to LolUgotOwnd [4s 4c]
sutjo650: folds
FrogOnAcid88: raises 800 to 1200
LolUgotOwnd: folds
Uncalled bet (800) returned to FrogOnAcid88
FrogOnAcid88 collected 875 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 875 | Rake 0
Seat 4: LolUgotOwnd (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: sutjo650 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: FrogOnAcid88 (small blind) collected (875)
PokerStars Game #80339687485: Tournament #559846017, $1.32+$0.18 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level X (300/600) - 2012/05/12 16:04:16 ET
Table '559846017 1' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 (1705 in chips)
Seat 4: LolUgotOwnd (5934 in chips)
Seat 6: rastaplan (1361 in chips)
FrogOnAcid88: posts the ante 50
LolUgotOwnd: posts the ante 50
rastaplan: posts the ante 50
FrogOnAcid88: posts small blind 300
LolUgotOwnd: posts big blind 600
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to LolUgotOwnd [4d 4c]
rastaplan: folds
FrogOnAcid88: raises 1055 to 1655 and is all-in
LolUgotOwnd:
Uncalled bet (1055) returned to FrogOnAcid88
FrogOnAcid88 collected 1350 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1350 | Rake 0
Seat 1: FrogOnAcid88 (small blind) collected (1350)
Seat 4: LolUgotOwnd (big blind) collected (0)
Seat 6: rastaplan (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
So I'm thinking about saying that we four play a video game together and we know each other. We are playing home game also together. (not too sure about that cuz I don't want you guys's account to be frozen.
To explain the hands I would say for the first hand : I do know frogonacid and I know he doesn't want to knock me out. When he said in the chat " check might be good" I thought I was deffinitly beaten
But this could be considered as collusion.
So I think I should go for : I do know frogonacid. I also know that when he says check might be good I thought that he wanted to induce a raise from me because he know that I raise when someone is weak. Since my hand was awesomly strong I went for a raise at first but I thought that he wanted to trap me. So I safely checked.
Second hand : I didn't want to knock him out.
third, fourth : I don't see anything unusual there. I didn't want to play what appears to be a coin flip. Looking back i'm thinking that I might have the odds to call- do I ?
I'm not enterily sure about this maybe I could go for a missclick, or I was away
I can explain the 3rd and 4th pretty easily but the first and second are outrageous.
I don't think negate the thing will actually resolve this. Maybe I could say yes we played together but now we stopped but then again they will freeze us. So idk
thanks for you reps
PS : if you guys respond to their e-mail before me: I'm an old 50 year old woman that play a video game k ? lol don't ask me more.. I registered with my mom's name
Edited by Activee, 27 June 2012 - 10:42 AM.











