95 replies to this topic

[MeGusta]

people using 1fx anticheat have no respect to fairplay
use it only when fp is down

Edited by MeGusta, 11 February 2013 - 07:21 PM.

[Foxdie]

all the fp bashing in this is pretty funny and senseless

[a-k]

people using 1fx anticheat have no respect to fairplay
use it only when fp is down

true. using 1fx is like spitting on shifty's work

[Foxdie]

no it isnt its just a program but the guys who made 1fx are acting like it means that lol

[MeGusta]

FP 4 LIFE

[shoke]

FP 4 LIFE

FAIL PLAY 4 life indeed, Obv, use what you want, and obviously we won't use a fail Anticheat.

[MeGusta]

see how 1fx people are, it's pretty immature and arrogant what you do. Like 1fx anticheat is unhackable bitch please i'll call demian we will see.

[shoke]

Like 1fx anticheat is unhackable bitch please i'll call demian we will see.

Good Luck.

[Mr. Postman]

There is actually no disrespect involved at all, though you should know we started developing our Anticheat mainly because of the reason Fairplay is so easy to bypass (Max reported those findings, apparently they never got fixed) and due to the fact Fairplay hasn't seen an update in quite a while. Also, because we develop our own Clientside, it is very effective and saves you a lot of FPS when playing. That was enough reason to start building it.

It's in its test phase at the moment (hence the "0.1" version) and we expect a lot of things to break. We also know this probably won't be a replacement of Fairplay, hence the full compatibility with @fp and such. Use whatever you want to, and if you want to support us, feel free to! We're very open to feedback and the like!

[MeGusta]

you just got stupid members who are arrogant and insult fairplay while they used it anyway gl with your anticheat ima use it only when fp down hf

[Foxdie]

There is actually no disrespect involved at all, though you should know we started developing our Anticheat mainly because of the reason Fairplay is so easy to bypass (Max reported those findings, apparently they never got fixed) and due to the fact Fairplay hasn't seen an update in quite a while. Also, because we develop our own Clientside, it is very effective and saves you a lot of FPS when playing. That was enough reason to start building it.

It's in its test phase at the moment (hence the "0.1" version) and we expect a lot of things to break. We also know this probably won't be a replacement of Fairplay, hence the full compatibility with @fp and such. Use whatever you want to, and if you want to support us, feel free to! We're very open to feedback and the like!

i like how this black person acts too bad the rest of your people are garbo

[dvz]

Why couldn't you force min values for net settings as well? How hard can it be seriously?

/rant

[Mr. Postman]

Why couldn't you force min values for net settings as well? How hard can it be seriously?

/rant

Such as? Provide us with names & values, and it will most likely be included in one of the next builds.

[Shekster]

hash developer 1

[dvz]

I'm pretty sure I've already done that but ok, min value for rate 10000, cl_maxpackets min value of 30

I see no reason why wouldn't you implement this since you're all into smooth gameplay and fps right(125fps in 2013 hard mission)? Also forcing rate could help many new players setting their net right cause there's a lot playing with 2500 and can't understand why they lag, but that's just a thought and def not the main purpose of this.

Otherwise I see no reason to use it instead of FP, even if your program is better coded, I think we could count on 1 hand the people whod be able to bypass fp anyhow, hence fp being hacked never really bothered me cause you know the people ur playing against well enough and their skill(.__.)

[BladHark]

/su

[dvz]

#fixac #mad

[patrick]

Dont change maxpackets, i hear that people use this a lot to make themself lag a bit or something.

just keep the settings as much as default possible. we happy, hackers unhappy.

[TURQUA]

instead of kicking people out, couldn't the anticheat change the disallowed value to the nearest allowed value?