I don't agree with that. I think you don't understand fully what odi was trying to say. He was saying that the user action (in this case being super aggressive) can be in the favour of the player being over aggressive.That's a pretty standard.
PokerStars wouldn't benefit byrigging their service by the way, they profit by how often you buy-in/play (rake). Rigging would make you mad and play less, thus less money for stars.
Most people who ran test to see if pokerstars was actually rigged ran their test over an enormous sample size but they didn't take into account users actions + pot size.
In other words, let's say you play 100 times AA, you win 82% of the time and lose 18% which is about right. but if in those 18 porcent you lose big pots there might be a problem. Even tho AA is a bad example because you will eventually play for a big pot if someone wants to play you.
Even tho I don't think there is such a mistake, it could definitly be possible that they made misconception making their algorithm to create cards which as I said is based on users actions. Cards aren't random, they are near random.
Even tho you are a troll and work in IT you should at least try to dig a bit deeper in the subject. I'm pretty sure you know about nothing on how cards are dealt on pokerstars. And your way of thinking is blatantly stupid to trust an organisation just by your simple faith. I'm beggining to think that it isn't possible to have a cognitive discussion with you. So please come with facts or stop being a retard trying to shut everyone who is saying the earth isn't flat.odi there hasn't been a single post on this forum you've made that hasn't been met with severe criticism on how blatantly stupid your perspective and logical thought process is.
They made a mistake doing ariane 5 I'm pretty sure pokerstars is capable of doing one too.
Edited by Activee, 12 July 2013 - 04:02 PM.
