so if someone kills himself even if it's not on purpose it's still -1 ?
Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Questions
Started by
Guest_xzi_*
, Jun 14 2008 10:51 PM
27 replies to this topic
#21
katana.
-
- Members
-
- 5,544 posts
Game Recognize Game
- Demo Team:-023-
#23
CAJUN
-
- Members
-
- 2,135 posts
Contributor
- Location:Netherlands
- Demo Clan:ros.
- Demo Team:-CODE-
Posted 16 June 2008 - 08:39 PM
Oh its not -1 if you throw a nade against a ''pole'' which isnt on purpose
Demobase Team Cup IV - -CODE- Secondary Nations Cup V 2010 - UNDUTCHBLS
Xzi's 1on1 cup 2008 - sparklys
#28
martijntje
-
- Members
-
- 1,603 posts
Contributor
- Location:Netherlands
Posted 17 June 2008 - 08:55 AM
no -1
Since the release of Soldier Of Fortune II in May, 2002. There hasn't been an anti-cheat available for version 1.00. This caused players to whine and ban people during clan wars for hacks. Reason most likely to be banned for is "2know", whatever the fuck that means. In early 2009, rumors started appearing around the SOF2 1.00 community that somebody was developing an anti-cheat. Everyone thought this was a great idea, seeing as the game had been out since the 17th century and nobody gave a fuck about it. All of the 16 players left on SOF2 1.00 cheered and supported the Hitler like figure who was developing this anti-cheat. When the anti-cheat was finally released, it was the biggest fucking failure in the history of video gaming. It was so humiliating that Michael Jackson died a few weeks later. The name of this anti-cheat was called "Mousetrap". It had been coded by some four eyed geek virgin who couldn't even code a fucking keygen.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
