Activee

If your stupid ass said this stupid shit in my face i would bitch slap the shit out of you. Proof? What about my Jewish ancestors that were gassed to death?

Fucking el retardo. Ofcourse my oppinion is more valid.

Tell me that this isn't unlike fanatism. You are thinking to hurt me because I don't think like you. Even WORSE  is what you think is based on an authority ! Christian believe in the bible authority. Muslims in the choran authority. In this subject your beliefs are based on what people told you heard from the medias/school/books authority. It's the same. In your world you cannot be wrong because the authority said so.

You could be right, I could be.But let me tell you something: neither of us is gonna be hurt if I come in front of you in real life. You just wouldn't dare to touch me. Do not threaten me.

<<What about the jewish ancestors that were gazed to death ?>> What about them ? Did you read the autopsies ? The video I posted is basing its idea on a Jewish museum in USA. Do not live by what others tell you. Go question things. And in the case you don't, please oh please, don't force your beliefs upon others.

Let me ask you a simple question to cool things down a little: Did it occur to you that if people knew they were about to be gazed there would be a mutiny ? It did to me at least. Surely in 2000 people about to be gazed at once there would be some individuals who panic. If that's something we accept as a possibility then we have to take into account that in that group of people the panic would spread like fire, stressful environment and known social effect. So soon the whole group would be freaking out. Do you know how many SS were holding the gaz chambers in auschwitz ? Lol like 3 to 6 in the building ( this is a  jewish testimony ). I mean it doesn't prove anything but it does raise questions and those should be answered and not shut.

Edit: watch the video, it raises good points. Truth doesn't fear investigation because it's the truth, thus you have nothing to fear by watching and questioning things. If you do, he talks about a stadium made of concrete walls in Belgium which hooligans broke (the walls). This is misinformation because the stadium was in a bad state and the walls weren't as solid as they should have been. 

 

oh no someone who thinks he has it all figured out

 

no school, jail, too much sof and pc time

 

but he knows all propaganda conspiracies

 

well educated.

That's exactly what I meant. You are emotionally biased.

If you have clear proofs that gaz chambers were indeed used to kill people let us know and let the conversation going but if you don't at least don't have the megalomania to think your opinion is more valid than the one of others just because it's yours.

Damn someone should have told me about this! I wish he was mentioned in history classes, documentaries, any movie that takes place around 39-45. 

In reality I just don't know that, I've not seen it. I have a friend who is a lot into this stuff and he talked to me about his theory that gaz chambers weren't to kill jews. That made made me understand that what I've been told about the guy could have been wrong. Once free of emotional bias my opinion leaned towards the idea that Hitler didn't want to kill jews. What is more reasonable ? That hitler and his evil minions that happened to be human wanted to exterminate jews by asphyxiating them or that he wanted to exclude them by putting them in camps that are kinda like prisons and people happened to die of malnutrition (in a period of war where food is lacking) ? It almost sounds funny to me how unbelievable the first hypothesis is, someone saying hey let's exterminate human with gaz, and everyone agrees because why not, this is too much for me, it's too big*. Sure my opinion is biased and not based on facts because I chosed to believe this. But I'm certain my lack of proof is equal to yours because you know.. we didn't specialize on the subject, we didn't do deep enough researches to have solid evidences.

The message I'm trying to convey to you is that you either believe what you are being told or you pick what's most believable to you. I'm not saying the first way is bad. It is situational. In fact that's how we learn as child, we believe what we are being told, "An elephant is an animal", "John Kennedy was president of USA", "Santa Claus comes in the chimney at christmass to bring you presents". As you grow old however you have to make the choice yourself that is you either believe what you are being told or you pick what's more likely to you and that's a very different process. And once you do that and you accept the premise that you could be wrong you are more open minded. You don't start wars because someone believe in another god, because you are free of that emotional attachment on such matters or you don't insult someone because he doesn't think Hitler was who we are being told he was.

You would for example trust an electrical engineer when he tells you that the positive wire goes on the positive pin of a battery even though the other option might sound better to you. Simply because he knows much more on the subject than you do. That's what I meant above when I said it is situational. In case of Hitler you could do the same... Believe historians because they simply know much more about the subject than we both do. However there is key differences here. The red wire thing is a unanimously accepted idea while the history behind Hitler is clearly not and nobody will gain anything by lying to you.

Hitler was promoting a racist ideology, he played a powerful role in fomenting a fascist society that viewed 'unwanted' people as something to be segregated and sterilized at best and outright exterminated at worst.

*The counter point which is: Hitler was insane that's why he did all that. That's not an explanation, that's a refusal to investigate. 

Hitler is seen as bad because he lost the war. He had a very optimistic and enjoyable character, his life's purpose was to put a smile on people faces. He decided to take jews money so he could do that, give it to less rich people. If you think Hitler is bad I guess you think Robbin wood is bad also ? Huh ? You evil bastard.

Christopher Columbus:

Well look at this grin... Admit it, the dude is breathing out happiness.

While the two above I'm just kidding for Gadaffi I honestly think the guy isn't as bad as media depict him. I'm not that much of a politic guy so my stance as no value. As for Columbus I'd give him the asshole first price. Hitler same as Gadaffi but I'm sure he wasn't the asshole history books make him out to be. It's easier to blame one crazy dude than to conceive the general population can be totally psychopathic in dark times.

Selling spinbot cheaper than aimjunkies, PM me if u wanna be GBE

 

btw it's unbannable undetectable 2015 !!!

God, you are still the biggest piece of shit the earth has ever had.