100 replies to this topic

[HowLinMaD]

Nationcups with 3 max a clan is pretty regular in 'gaming world', fact is best CLANS usually contain players from 1 nationality anyway. To make it a nation cup instead of a clan cup they made the max 3 player rule, country that has most players in top level clans will win it.

Let the people speak!

[s2hko]

YES

[Junior]

no, if it wasnt been like these previous nc's, it shouldnt be like this now.

[Kenji]

nation cup = best players of each country

so no .. lol

[P4P3R]

Hmm I understand that would make things a bit more fair. Teams in both DNC and Secondary would become more equal but wouldn't it make the top weaker... I mean the best nation ain't all that awesome anymore and you'd probably get clan hopping before the NC's.

Overall the pros and cons, i'd say yes, why not, even though the former NCs worked out fine.

EDIT: Although that rule would be brought up too late for this NC imo... we are already experiencing all the bullshit about who plays for what country so for now i'd say put it on-hold.

[FRZ`]

good idea

[doctorfunk]

I don't think it is a good rule check the fact is that best turkey players are in sK
and best nl players are in c4.
why indo cam ghost ref couldn't play together? They are nl's top4
while they are all in c4.

same for poland most of team.pol is in bro| atm
deadman karf prsk windows darkness..

[NavySeal]

no, just bring the best players of that nation. Who cares what clan they in.

[Kenji]

no, just bring the best players of that nation. Who cares what clan they in.

[Museki]

very easy to bypass, just kick few of those players from ur clan during the nationscup.
big no to that, best players should play.

[Laffe Herder]

idd just make c5. and join c4. after the NC

[FreeStyle]

idd just make c5. and join c4. after the NC

would be gay

[Laffe Herder]

same as the rule but i asked xillax and he said it wont happen... it would be a gayrule for the team of mine...

[katana.]

3 is to small anyway, 5 should be good, but i agree noob rule!

[Richard]

I never said this rule should be used in this nationscup, I think it should be implanted in the future nationcups tho.
By some of the negative responds in this topic I can read most of you don't understand this rule, or the use of this rule.


First of all its not so easy to bypass at all, nation captains have to know the history of their team members. You can't just kick some of your players from your clans just in front of the nationscup because you will have to sign up your clan for different cups while the nationcup is running, which means you won't be able to registrate your entire team.



Rules like this are not NOOB rules, dumb rules or strange rules. They have a purpose. For example:
Overall a clan that fields a team are FRIENDS, or you've just played together for a long time. In other words, if you want to get into a team such as NL or BE, which are basicly just clans. Its almost impossible to get to play in those teams while your better than some players might be. You wont even get a chance. The discussion about azzy could be an example of this.

In most cases nationteams don't bring the best players of the nation as some of you want it to, they bring clanmembers because they are well known to eachother.

Katana: With 3 players, the rule means you can FIELD 3 players of 1 clan in a MATCH. Its possible to add 6 members of 1 clan to your nationteam, they are just not all allowed to play together in 1 single match.

[apoc.sL]

100% yes

[Museki]

I think azzy was in avelgem last nc but didn't play either.
And this game has less clans than some cs(s) and every good player has been in nrly every topclan (except for c4 maybe) so clanhistory???
+ we have teams aswell which means nrly every player has been in same team/clan atleast once.

[P4P3R]

muse still, i've played with quite a few people but that doesn't make my relationships to them equal.
For example if I were to be captain i'd chose Project over Sparklys, even though i've played with the both of them in nsz.
And i'm not talking skill-wise.. it's just that I "have a better bond with" Project thus i'd go for him. The same can be said about everyone else.

I think that is what Richard is trying to point out.