87 replies to this topic

[m@rty]

sK were the better side and deserved to win. I think we were just gutted that we fucked up the first match as we should have won that I think.

[ville]

SORRY ALL

Edited by ville, 18 July 2010 - 09:17 PM.

[Blade]

After winning red side that good and having 4-4 on blue i was thinking of ok, this is here. Then main started to die more and me and marty switched places (i went to main). Screwd up 1 or 2 backfucks there witch could have prolly make us the winning point.

In the second match kinda lost my motivation after first few rounds, nothing just didnt work. Couldnt hit at all + i think we were bit more defensive with zioni in this second 1.

Gg sK, so close but still so far for us. Maybe we can get more activ on autum.

Very nice report. really enjoy'd to read it.

[azzy]

We "easily" gave it away in Blue too, it's not normal for us to suck so bad on blue, not saying we would win 10/1 on blue the first game, but I think we should've atleast won it.

In red we played quite amazing, I don't think it was all she sucking, I think only players who played this match should say stuff like this.. also that 10/1 didn't come out of nowhere.. but that's my opinion.


gg either way

[fainthjue]

GG.

[defqon]

gg nt.

[executor]

i feel entire rematches when there is a draw are one the most biased, unfair methods to settle a match. Having said that, we can only blame ourselves (i didnt play, but still a she member) as we gave it away so easily in the second round.

In all fairness, in the case of a tie i have a good idea to settle the match in a more fair, shorter way:

- 5 1on1's (every player in the war plays one).
- The players in the team that won their side in the shortest time can choose which side they play on in their 1on1 and which player of the other team they play against.
- After 5 such 1on1's, the team with 3 or more won 1on1's simply goes through.

not only this will stimulate a team to move away from whoring, kitchen camping, anti-sof tactics but it is also a more logical, fair way to settle a one-hour match compared to playing an extension of another one-hour match to settle it, which is just really inaccurate

as interesting as that is, it would be 10000000x more unfair than playing a rematch. For one, one on ones aren't about skill but positioning, who's willing to play gayer in order to win (see foxdie vs johan). Every player would try to be like borno and sit there glitching in order to win, because they don't want to rush stupidly expose themselves and die. I can gaurentee she would win that penalty kick type 1on1 format because you all have low pings, you can lean behind a box and your bullets hit instantly. Me, abu, and prime would all have to get lucky in order to win, because if you poke ur head out shoot 3 bullets then lean back in, your already behind cover even if i had my crosshair on you and clicked before you fired your first bullet. It's a shame too, i'd be all for this tie breaker if i was a euro snugg, on gold they give me so much shit for leaning behind a box/wall and raping people instantly, my style of play there is more like borno's because that's what im good at

Edited by executor, 18 July 2010 - 09:31 PM.

[- RAUL -]

weird but gg :s

[bing bang blaow]

i didnt read all posts, but seriously, i thought sK lost it when I saw the first screenshot and im quite happy that in the end sK managed to win. as for the rematch thingy, i think anyone would agree with me that playing it some other day would of been better since the 2nd game didnt seem as tight (people are usually tired..or something else brought she's mood down like givin up so 'easily' etc..). however, first game seemed tight and gg.

Edited by rocket, 18 July 2010 - 09:35 PM.

[Blade]

exe you suck with ak anyway, nothing to do with ping ;DD

[muumi]

knew this all along

goodgame gratz on final place eG is ez shit :s

[HEIHACHI]

with villes rage, eg shall takes its first medal

[Sav]

gg

[luminoKo]

as for the rematch thingy, i think anyone would agree with me that playing it some other day would of been better since the 2nd game didnt seem as tight (people are usually tired..or something else brought she's mood down like givin up so 'easily' etc..). however, first game seemed tight and gg.

It's not rematch but extension, same with soccer, you have to play on.
You have to be prepared it can happen you play draw.
And besides, both agreed on playing on.
But yeah if you want it different next time, propose this to the admins.

[-=OG=- DONKEYROLLER]

lol @ u comparing sof with soccer

[abu]

lol @ you for naming your self donkeyroller

[bing bang blaow]

It's not rematch but extension, same with soccer, you have to play on.
You have to be prepared it can happen you play draw.
And besides, both agreed on playing on.
But yeah if you want it different next time, propose this to the admins.

lol you totally skipped my point..she probably agreed to rematch 'because it seemed like the right thing to do'..but probably they were frustrated and didnt want to play it all over again..you know this feeling, when you just cba to play but ull say "ok" just cause of..sportmanship? or whatever. but it was played so we cant change anything now.

[Rait]

exe you suck with ak anyway, nothing to do with ping ;DD

treu stori!!

[Laffe Herder]

Lol whiners. sK won she lost. The last points are points aswell. Same as soccer you van lose in the 91' minute.
Reading shit about line ups and motivations is annoying.
Guess teamwork won here, otherwise post who shined.

[malign]

10-5 in red wow, from both sides. Funny shit.