89 replies to this topic

[P4P3R]

conclusion: noob uploaders need to upload their pics to www.imageshack.us from now on

Tbh as soon as an admin moves the topic and renames it to [unsent], [sent], [busted], [3rd] etc etc that should be sufficient proof whether or not the screenshot has disappeared a day after or even a minute after.

[luminoKo]

yes, i understand, its to late now and not even worth starting the topic in the first place. i just made that ss months ago to show ville what a hypocrit he was hehe ;d

I know Ville is not a loving person in here, but if you just ignore him it should be okey.
Else you can expect he will go the Butcher way and crash servers for example.
We all know he has to learn some stuff, but as long he plays with fairplay now and is sending his demos, let him.

btw that flame in my previous post was intented to offend u incase u didnt knwo that ;d

When someone does offend you, you don't have to offend back.
But I am not suprised that you are surprised about this, since 80% of this community don't know this 'secret'.

[t0xic]

I know that secret!
but yes to be on topic i totally agree with joey
saying this being neutral btw

Edited by t0xic, 04 October 2010 - 10:23 PM.

[luminoKo]

I know that secret!
but yes to be on topic i totally agree with joey
saying this being neutral btw

Well propose it to the admins
They got the power here, I am only maintaining the current rules so.

[fleim]

Tbh as soon as an admin moves the topic and renames it to [unsent], [sent], [busted], [3rd] etc etc that should be sufficient proof whether or not the screenshot has disappeared a day after or even a minute after.

gotta agree with joey here, its pretty stupid some requests are not 'valid' anymore only because the ip screenshot has disappeared..

[t0xic]

gotta agree with joey here, its pretty stupid some requests are not 'valid' anymore only because the ip screenshot has disappeared..

yeah
@lumi, a proposal isn't even necessary tbqh. if an admin sees this [im sure an admin will] they should do something about it.

[Juul]

oh so by this rational, this fucker can go off without a conciquence... nais! really fucking nais, whoopy fucking DO! this shows that the admins on this forum that lead this section are incompetent and lazy. the screenshots expired cause you guys were to blind to see this. now the screenshot is missing while some admin did adjust the title to unsent, but since he forgot to adjust the unsent list they become invalid? are you joking? is this how you run things? seriously...

[luminoKo]

is this how you run things? seriously...

Yes, it is.

You want me to explain stuff again?

First of all, back then we didn't have rules about the opponent have to upload their demos too.
Maybe Ze and Krazzy (who basicly control the unsent-list now) didn't count these unsents from Ville (the old ones) because of the new system?
A lot has changed in a positive way.
As we as a small group with some external helpers here are the only ones who actually do something here, why do you guys all complain?
You got the right for this I know that, but you are giving critics meanwhile you don't know the real situation?
I don't know who was admin back then, ask Doctorfunk or someone else, I have nothing to do with this and Krazzy wasn't admin as well back then I think.

Because the title is changed to 'unsent' doesn't make it a valid case for the current list, maybe there was a reason for this.
Let's see how Krazzy and the rest will think about it, if they think theses cases are valid it's fine for me, but I stay outside of this.

[FreeStyle]

listen to lumi! blame DOCTORFUNK

[Juul]

Yes, it is.

You want me to explain stuff again?

First of all, back then we didn't have rules about the opponent have to upload their demos too.
Maybe Ze and Krazzy (who basicly control the unsent-list now) didn't count these unsents from Ville (the old ones) because of the new system?
A lot has changed in a positive way.
As we as a small group with some external helpers here are the only ones who actually do something here, why do you guys all complain?
You got the right for this I know that, but you are giving critics meanwhile you don't know the real situation?
I don't know who was admin back then, ask Doctorfunk or someone else, I have nothing to do with this and Krazzy wasn't admin as well back then I think.

Because the title is changed to 'unsent' doesn't make it a valid case for the current list, maybe there was a reason for this.
Let's see how Krazzy and the rest will think about it, if they think theses cases are valid it's fine for me, but I stay outside of this.

ill just give you a lil example of what i think thats wrong with this post alone.

because the title has changed to ''unsent'' doesnt make this valid. correct me if im wrong, the only ones who can adjust those topics are the admins.. right? So howcome these arent valid? cuz it was runned by other admins than now you say the previous onces are incompotent to their job they so bravely did? maybe we will say the same thing about you guys in 6 months; ohya!! that aint valid, we changed cuz it looked better and thought it was quite a joke, we didnt change it cuz it was really unsent. we just fuck around so people can complain over 6 months about us failing at accomplishing our job as admin. you have to responsibillity as a admin, if you dont like it.. dont do it. no1 is forcing you. the fact that the topic was changed by an admin should be more than enough proof that is was unsent cause you are the only ones that CAN change it. It wasnt me who changed it to unsent. so whats the deal there?

if you get my point ofcourse

referring to the past is just a weak excuse for not willing to face the truth.

your position is weak as you trying to explain how you run things, so yes, do explain me this again. cause this post is nothing more than a weak excuse.

[asrael]

Yes, it is.

You want me to explain stuff again?

First of all, back then we didn't have rules about the opponent have to upload their demos too.
Maybe Ze and Krazzy (who basicly control the unsent-list now) didn't count these unsents from Ville (the old ones) because of the new system?

If so it should've said 'request invalid' or something along the likes of that, instead of 'unsent'. If it says unsent, it was judged valid

A lot has changed in a positive way.
As we as a small group with some external helpers here are the only ones who actually do something here, why do you guys all complain?

Oh come on. It's a small task to check the topics and edit the topic title + 1 little topic.
Plus if you can't handle people complaining, resign.

You got the right for this I know that, but you are giving critics meanwhile you don't know the real situation?
I don't know who was admin back then, ask Doctorfunk or someone else, I have nothing to do with this and Krazzy wasn't admin as well back then I think.
Because the title is changed to 'unsent' doesn't make it a valid case for the current list, maybe there was a reason for this.
Let's see how Krazzy and the rest will think about it, if they think theses cases are valid it's fine for me, but I stay outside of this.

We don't just count the unsents that were made during the time THIS system was applied now, did we ?
It was valid back then, thus it should be counted as an unsent. As he didn't send his record. See the logic behind it ?

Edited by asrael, 05 October 2010 - 06:35 AM.

[krisch]

jst ban all of u fuckin faggets

[luminoKo]

So howcome these arent valid?

Like I said if the rest think it's valid it's fine for me.
But as you can see Krazzy/Ze didn't take these up in the list.
I was just thinking it is invalid, not referring it is invalid.

cuz it was runned by other admins than now you say the previous onces are incompotent to their job they so bravely did?

Well yeah probably something went wrong with the calculation of unsent demos?
Else Ville would have 4 eh?

maybe we will say the same thing about you guys in 6 months; ohya!! that aint valid, we changed cuz it looked better and thought it was quite a joke, we didnt change it cuz it was really unsent. we just fuck around so people can complain over 6 months about us failing at accomplishing our job as admin. you have to responsibillity as a admin, if you dont like it.. dont do it. no1 is forcing you.

Come on Marco you serious?
I was appointed first of all, not my own choice to become moderator.
I do this in my free time, and we both know that I'm doing my best and working hard with the cups.
I just don't want to apply stuff without seeing how the rest of the admins think about it.
Don't come with the story about responsibility from me because I just gave my opinion about the case lol...

the fact that the topic was changed by an admin should be more than enough proof that is was unsent cause you are the only ones that CAN change it. It wasnt me who changed it to unsent. so whats the deal there?

I just told you by the previous post, let's see how the other admins think about it.

your position is weak as you trying to explain how you run things, so yes, do explain me this again. cause this post is nothing more than a weak excuse.

You're kidding right?
How can my position be weak meanwhile I didn't do anything yet?
Maybe my opinion is way acrossed yours, but you don't have to release your anger on me, I get your point now Marco.....

If so it should've said 'request invalid' or something along the likes of that, instead of 'unsent'. If it says unsent, it was judged valid

Jup I would think the same, but let's see why Krazzy/Ze didn't count these, maybe there is a reason for like I told before...

Oh come on. It's a small task to check the topics and edit the topic title + 1 little topic.
Plus if you can't handle people complaining, resign.

We know that now Niels that we shouldn't express ourselves because of some critics, we know it now, sorry oke?

See the logic behind it ?

Yes I do yes, but maybe there was a reason for it?????
Let's wait and just chill lol.. jesus

[Junior]

when that happened krazzy wasnt in charge of it but asrael was

[iperr]

nt miniman !

[MiniMan]

nt miniman !

wtf is wrong with u i never tried to get him banned i just wanted to know why didnt he get banned back then

[DARK]

niels sjattap

Edited by luminoKo, 05 October 2010 - 01:00 PM.

[~homii]

what are you guys flaming lumi for lol?

[Rait]

lol, didnt read anything in this topic but this is rathe gay.
a guy with more than 3 unsents gets no ban.
and yet, somebody saw someone use m60 sniper in a mixwar or barrelcamp ( defined as running throught the barrel) and they are banned AS FAST AS POSSIBLE.
Should be the way around, but meh, whatever floats your boat.

[R3NZ0]

agree !! ban him allrdy