308 replies to this topic

[katana.]

haha umii but what exactly got junior fooled? that movsk likes to play with team icon on? yea busted! lol...

[- RAUL -]

KRimi u gotz braindamage :S

[uMii]

like u nade entrance and middle of conf @ warm up waiting on other members.

[- RAUL -]

+1

[deskie]

ITS BEFORE A WAR.

ever tried turning on FRIENDLYFIRE before a war for the luls?

without a demo its unfair to bust him.

yw movsk. dont even really know you so i have no reason to stick up for you.

[bing bang blaow]

from: usa
point made: no






JK U KNOW I JKZ

Edited by rocket, 15 January 2011 - 08:17 PM.

[krimiiiii]

no u dont.

[BladHark]

just prove it was before the war by uploading your demo of the war (which you said you had) so this topic can get locked

[RiffyCille]

YO MOVSK, SUP MAROCCAN BRO (L)

[defqon]

idk if this hasnt been said yet or w.e but if you(movsk) claim u were blue then why isnt they guy on top of east bunker(who is on red) not shooting you? That makes him your teammate and makes you on the red team. And then your also shooting a blue icon while your healthbar is blue which also supports the fact that your red. No demo is needed because everybody already knows about this hack because of turqua. And your also shooting jet who is blue while you are red( because your code). The whole "it was before a war" isnt enough the cancel out what is in the ss imo It would be different if this hack was unknown or w.e i guess. GG BUSTED NO WAY OUT

Edited by dзғqσи, 15 January 2011 - 10:47 PM.

[DARK]

Lol maybe you are super serial before you start a war, but the vast majority of players here like to fool around before getting all serious. So why would he shoot the red guy when it's raul who probably was on vt/mumble with movsk having some fun

[KaSS]

gotta agree with what tom said ^^

[defqon]

Lol maybe you are super serial before you start a war, but the vast majority of players here like to fool around before getting all serious. So why would he shoot the red guy when it's raul who probably was on vt/mumble with movsk having some fun

doesnt look like movsk is fooling around too much to me.

[DARK]

O really, and you see all that from a screenshot?

[defqon]

same thing in my view. can you see them fooling around from the ss?

[DARK]

From an objective point of view, not assuming the worst, and knowing raul and movsk since i played with them countless times. Yes i can tell.

Or did i just contradict myself? Meh i made mah point

[t0xic]

at least we dont need hacks to win LOL NAB U SUCK AT SOF

cool contradiction there

[Foxdie]

i agree with dark move to busted

[deskie]

@defqon

ur American so uve probably heard this. "the burden of proof rests upon the state" it's not movsks job to prove his innocence. It's the busters job to prove he hacked, key word prove. Not show how he could have hacked prove that he actually did. U people are using too much circumstantial evidence. Which means all of your conclusions are based of other conclusions not concrete evidence. People make mistakes just like when abu "godmoded" exe was wrong, whoever says move to busted could be wrong just the same. Stranger things have happened in sof that 2 nonteamates not attacking eachother, hell I've seen people run right past eachother through a door, and not see eachother.

[defqon]

if its not movsk job then whos is it? Whos his lawyer? there is enough proof imo to make him busted and the rest is his job to make his justifications. And movsk has done that as he said the war didnt even start. Now its up to the admins tbh

Btw Who takes an @fs when they are just fooling around?

u didnt make your point yet dark.