308 replies to this topic

[deskie]

He doesn't have to explain anything or give any demo that's the point. You have to prove he was hacking not him having to prove he wasn't. No proof no bust. This isn't definative proof. Just as he showed in his own ss, it can happen this way without hacks. Ultimately admins have the final say of course but I think it's exercising too much power to just say he PROBABLY was hacking based on 1 iNCONCLUSIVE screenshot that's already been duplicated.

[defqon]

He does have to. If he doesn't its like wtf hes probably hiding in shame or w.e bs u wanna come with and then its easy for the admins to say its busted because THIS is how turq and them got busted so we can almost make assumption that he is indeed hacking but i know what u mean there isnt enough proof w.e blah blah but tbh you cant get any clearer than this ss. The only twist came in was when raul and movsk said that this was before the war even started. SO he did have to defend himself in order to make this whole situation different. Before it was just gonna be like o ok this is obvious boom banned but now its different because of movsk's defense

[LMO]

the fact he remade a new ss to try and fool ppl is enough to see hes regretting the fact he probably used the hack and got caught

no person with nothing to hide would remake the ss and try and show he wasnt hacking as he obviously doesnt have to use the hack in his remade ss

i still think ur cool mo just this is lame

Edited by LMO, 16 January 2011 - 05:46 AM.

[bing bang blaow]

point is i twisted my leg before 2o2 vs zionu abi and forgty

[LMO]

point is i twisted my leg before 2o2 vs zionu abi and forgty

lolol 2vs2 and u say vs 3 ppl nice job rocket

[skyloline]

just prove it was before the war by uploading your demo of the war (which you said you had) so this topic can get locked

[- RAUL -]

if its not movsk job then whos is it? Whos his lawyer? there is enough proof imo to make him busted and the rest is his job to make his justifications. And movsk has done that as he said the war didnt even start. Now its up to the admins tbh

Btw Who takes an @fs when they are just fooling around?

u didnt make your point yet dark.

REAd da topic then u know why i took the ss before match started :x

[Button]

War or no war, didnt he use the hack so busted anyways?

[R3NZ0]

obviously clean.. nt abu and crew

[Junior]

movsk has to post his demo. he posted yesterday he has it so...

[Pulyka]

Busted

[Butcher]

Busted

[MaaZu]

Busted

[asrael]

Why don't you man up already....

[deskie]

@defqon never assume anything but innocence. He doesn't have to post ss without a proper request. This has been discussed 1000 of time. Ip ss + 1 demo or stfu. Tbh if no1 from cc was recording we should assume they were hacking right?

Edited by deskie, 16 January 2011 - 02:16 PM.

[KaSS]

puri, i doubt in any situation that raul would try to bust movsk since they suck each others dick all the time. therefore in no way this coulda been serious.

[MoPy]

this hack is soooooooooooooo 2010!

everybody got it alrdy? u dont got it? ask me on msn!

[l'ANGELINOOO `]

i dont got it, and lmao defqon those are the dumbest replies ever.
Why on earth should movsk proof he's clean? They think they hack, so they have to proof he's not clean. (abu etc.)
and this screenshot just isn't enough proof. There for movsk COULD upload his demo, but he doesn't really have to, since nobody requested it. (dumb)

But I think movsk can and will upload the demo to get rid of this shit.

[abu]

@defqon never assume anything but innocence. He doesn't have to post ss without a proper request. This has been discussed 1000 of time. Ip ss + 1 demo or stfu. Tbh if no1 from cc was recording we should assume they were hacking right?

then whats the point of @fs ? its busted deskie if u talk one more time in topic i fuck u up i swear

[asrael]

Whatsup with the screenshot not being enough proof