Toggle shoutbox
Shoutbox
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number #1
#182
Posted 16 December 2012 - 10:08 AM
Polish Cup - #noskillzGaming
Demobase NationsCup IV - Team.Estonia
History:
sK., -HaZe- , [[ cG |, .sD', .sL', couz, bro|, ironCore`, estownia, , enemysNightmare(eN), *HtF*, GS|, .[cR], -=*$|GOD|$*=-, -=T|c=-, //eXeLenCe, eGang, Dk , incontrol, -oSa-, tGz, [R10], .g3, plastiquez, -NijnTje-, DTG, /Rs*, @conflict, inflixi, DaClowns, -wee-
#183
Posted 16 December 2012 - 11:10 AM

XILLAX zegt (14:14):
kass online?
Mike. zegt (14:14):
Yes
XILLAX zegt (14:15):
gimmi his msn
i only got his "Muahzor"
Mike. zegt (14:15):
muahzor@hotmail.com
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
#184
Posted 16 December 2012 - 11:21 AM
But don't take my opinion as a gold either, since I kinda now nothing about this game anymore lol
Edited by skyloline, 16 December 2012 - 11:23 AM.
Polish Cup - #noskillzGaming
Demobase NationsCup IV - Team.Estonia
History:
sK., -HaZe- , [[ cG |, .sD', .sL', couz, bro|, ironCore`, estownia, , enemysNightmare(eN), *HtF*, GS|, .[cR], -=*$|GOD|$*=-, -=T|c=-, //eXeLenCe, eGang, Dk , incontrol, -oSa-, tGz, [R10], .g3, plastiquez, -NijnTje-, DTG, /Rs*, @conflict, inflixi, DaClowns, -wee-
#186
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:27 PM
Zioni stands out of the crowd imo. He plays 2-3 times a month and still can pull off these amazing actions. As about luminaire, he isn't hard to read, always the same. If he is roof, always coming down at exact same time, nading patterns, everything. Also this applies to many "god" tier players in this game(on mpshop). It's not always about aiming, but knowing your opponent, his style, patterns, technique.
But don't take my opinion as a gold either, since I kinda now nothing about this game anymore lol
barcelona is also easy to read, yet theres no way to really counter them

http://c4.liezerserv.com
AKA Steven
#187
Posted 16 December 2012 - 03:19 PM
barcelona is also easy to read, yet theres no way to really counter them

oh wait counter you said.. hmm

Edited by ~ACER*, 16 December 2012 - 03:25 PM.
#188
Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:29 PM
oh wait counter you said.. hmm
YOU RETARD HELLO????
2 times they have been defeated by teams that dug in and won on counterattack, yes. But out of how many times? Every week they defeat this tactic. Goddammit you're such an idiot..
There's not a tactic in the world that has more odds of winning a match but obviously in football, there's never any certainty.
abu's day is ruined becuz of chris
abu is so mad
LOL
#189
Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:43 PM
YOU RETARD HELLO????
2 times they have been defeated by teams that dug in and won on counterattack, yes. But out of how many times? Every week they defeat this tactic. Goddammit you're such an idiot..
There's not a tactic in the world that has more odds of winning a match but obviously in football, there's never any certainty.
Are you kidding me?
1. Real Madrid 38 32 4 2 121:32 100
2. Barcelona 38 28 7 3 114:29 91
2009 last time barca won cl?
Edited by ~ACER*, 16 December 2012 - 04:44 PM.
#190
Posted 16 December 2012 - 04:48 PM
Are you kidding me?
1. Real Madrid 38 32 4 2 121:32 100
2. Barcelona 38 28 7 3 114:29 91
2009 last time barca won cl?
are u kidding me you retard?? In every loss they had, where they defeated by the SAME tactic? #usebrainsplz
edit: ill try my best to explain to some noschooled fuck like yourself. If you count the times barca won against this tactic and compair it to the amount of times barca lost against this tactic. Which tactic won more? And the result wont be 51% against 49% or something like that, you dumb fuck.
Edited by Junior, 16 December 2012 - 04:56 PM.
abu's day is ruined becuz of chris
abu is so mad
LOL
#191
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:13 PM
are u kidding me you retard?? In every loss they had, where they defeated by the SAME tactic? #usebrainsplz
edit: ill try my best to explain to some noschooled fuck like yourself. If you count the times barca won against this tactic and compair it to the amount of times barca lost against this tactic. Which tactic won more? And the result wont be 51% against 49% or something like that, you dumb fuck.
You need alot of text to say the same thing.
the tactic lol, just saying there tactic is obvious not the best since they dind't win any big prices last year.
Wat means, the tactic of Chelsea and Real Madrid was obvious better since chelsea won CL, and Real Madrid since they won the primera div.
So it was obvious the TACTIC of Real Madrid was better in the competitiion since they won more games (32vs28),
#192
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:26 PM
You need alot of text to say the same thing.
the tactic lol, just saying there tactic is obvious not the best since they dind't win any big prices last year.
Wat means, the tactic of Chelsea and Real Madrid was obvious better since chelsea won CL, and Real Madrid since they won the primera div.
So it was obvious the TACTIC of Real Madrid was better in the competitiion since they won more games (32vs28),
WRONG you're looking at only one year, cus you're dumb ofc. (en je kan duidelijk niet verder nadenken dan je neus lang is). Barca is using this tactic already for more than a year and has won alot more by far than lost. (including actual prices)
Anyways, the fact that Chelsea won proves what i said, that in football nothing is certain, is right. Still barca has won alot more against that tactic than the other way around. Which proves what steven said is right.
The fact Real Madrid won the competition shows they were more effective that season but it doesnt prove the fact there is a tactic better than barca's tactic and able to counter barca's tactic, fuckin moron.
If you still don't get it, you're hopeless which will most likely be the case.
edit: Real and Chelsea tactic weren't the same either, idiot. So really irrelevant for you trying to prove there actually is a tactic to counter barca's.
all you're showing here is that nothing is certain in football but you're not coming with proof that steven's statement was wrong.
Edited by Junior, 16 December 2012 - 05:39 PM.
abu's day is ruined becuz of chris
abu is so mad
LOL
#193
Posted 16 December 2012 - 05:56 PM
WRONG you're looking at only one year, cus you're dumb ofc. (en je kan duidelijk niet verder nadenken dan je neus lang is). Barca is using this tactic already for more than a year and has won alot more by far than lost. (including actual prices)
Anyways, the fact that Chelsea won proves what i said, that in football nothing is certain, is right. Still barca has won alot more against that tactic than the other way around. Which proves what steven said is right.
The fact Real Madrid won the competition shows they were more effective that season but it doesnt prove the fact there is a tactic better than barca's tactic and able to counter barca's tactic, fuckin moron.
If you still don't get it, you're hopeless which will most likely be the case.
edit: Real and Chelsea tactic weren't the same either, idiot. So really irrelevant for you trying to prove there actually is a tactic to counter barca's.
all you're showing here is that nothing is certain in football but you're not coming with proof that steven's statement was wrong.
You are now talking about your own statement not about the one of steven.
But yea, that AC MILAN got the best tactic in europe they never changed it and won more then barca in europa.(:
the only irrelevant thing here is you saying idiot retard (dutch shit).
#195
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:07 PM
Easy to read? They score so much inside the 16 lol, they just have alot of ball possesion > attacking formation > opponent defending formation. The way they score is pure magic and not even close to easy to readbarcelona is also easy to read, yet theres no way to really counter them
#196
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:38 PM
barcelona is also easy to read, yet theres no way to really counter them
I just showed 2 recent momements almost everyone know where they did counter barca.
Then I read your post and im like yea:
it's pretty sad to see someone as stupid as you are, but its even worse to see someone who actually believes he's not.
Edited by ~ACER*, 16 December 2012 - 08:10 PM.
#197
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:45 PM
i think bladhark was being sarcastic katanaEasy to read? They score so much inside the 16 lol, they just have alot of ball possesion > attacking formation > opponent defending formation. The way they score is pure magic and not even close to easy to read
teams that try and attack them will get outplayed and just give space away > pew pew and thats why hardly any team does that against barcelona. SO YEA..NOT EASY TO READ ;D




#198
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:09 PM
#199
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:13 PM
I just showed 2 recent momements almost everyone know where they did counter barca.
Then I read your post and im like yea:
yes but u wanted to prove steven WRONG and ur 2 moments dont prove him wrong. They show there isnt any certainty in football since barca's tactic will win 90% of those matches. ffs get it in that empty head of yours.
Edited by Junior, 16 December 2012 - 09:13 PM.
abu's day is ruined becuz of chris
abu is so mad
LOL
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






