123 replies to this topic

[Luigiz]

yea , it's /adm suspend to suspend and /adm suspend to enable it again.

Edited by Luigiz, 14 March 2010 - 09:27 PM.

[F!ve]

it takes max. 15 sec to remove everyones admin as there can only be maximum 7,8 ppl from one clan in server (3 subs only). so i cant see why is it hard to remove them and just give them back when scrim is over

[Luigiz]

it takes max. 15 sec to remove everyones admin as there can only be maximum 7,8 ppl from one clan in server (3 subs only). so i cant see why is it hard to remove them and just give them back when scrim is over

tbh , 2 subs , not 3. and yea , ain't that hard.

Edited by Luigiz, 14 March 2010 - 09:34 PM.

[heldro]

change it to 3 since it allready happened. its better anyway if you ask me.

[Luigiz]

change it to 3 since it allready happened. its better anyway if you ask me.

I don't myself mind even if there were 5 subs max but that just have been decided that 2 is max.
And I don't see that as the reason to change it to 3 just because it has already happened once.

Edited by Luigiz, 14 March 2010 - 09:36 PM.

[F!ve]

thought it was 3 :/. my bad

[Luigiz]

thought it was 3 :/. my bad

np : )

[fkh]

our match had no trouble at all with 3 subs..

oh and: the rcon stuff , just let it be like this.
I gave five and folly temporary rcon, it worked well imo + admin remove is no prob.

[Slizer]

Well, why didn't you guys play 5v5 and you would have 2 subs in spec?

[fkh]

Well, why didn't you guys play 5v5 and you would have 2 subs in spec?

we wanted, est refused. they used ur rules..

[BariS]

Oh that is another thing. Sliz what if we play 4 v 4 with 2 spec or 5 v 5 with 2 specs? I mean one time their are 6 of each time and one time there are 7? Do we still say X v X + 2 subs or do we say 4 v 4 + 3 specs, 5 v 5 + 2 specs & 6 v 6 + 1 spec? Like this there are 7 players of each team in the server continuesly. I mean maybe we should change the rule of how many specs into how many players of each team can be in the server??

[Brighty]

i don't think there will be played 6v6, but i do like the idea of:

- 4v4 + max 3 specs
- 5v5 + max 2 specs

[Slizer]

I would use the system that Brighty says, 4v4 = 3 subs, 5v5 = 2 subs, 6v6 = 1 sub... just to make it simple. I dunno what Doc says though.

[Brighty]

was baris idea btw don't give me the credits slizer haha.

but we don't really play 6v6 on scrims and maby 2-3 clans can deal with 6v6 and the rest prefers 4v4 or 5v5.

but indeed lets wait what Doc says about it.

[Slizer]

Oh yes, baris said it xD That's the system I meant though. It sounds pretty reasonable and fair.

However the 6v6 limit will be there IN CASE two clans have enough and they both want to let all players in, such as MDK, CST, xG... dunno about others, maybe SoA is fine with that too.

5v5 with 2 subs per clan + 2 referee's is perfect.

Edited by Slizer, 15 March 2010 - 12:14 PM.

[Luigiz]

Good idea. Now just go and ask doc!

[BariS]

Hey is it against the rules if we have 1 or 2 more clips for AK ammo.

Until now many servers use it already (MDK, CST, and some more). And probably some scrims have been played in one of these servers already.

It's just that 90 + 30 never been enough, especially for 1sters. We have to preshoot 3rders a lot more. And please don't tell me that "get used to it". I am suggesting it here seriously.

I can play with the default amount of ammo, np. But I don't want to die because my AK is empty, and I can't find another AK on the ground because there is only shotguns..

And it's a fact that 1sters run faster out of ammo then 3rders, because we use AK more and preshoot 3rders more.


Hmm.. something in me says, there will be decided that ammo won't be changed, just because of favor against 1sters. But I mean, also vertexlight was enabled when majority wanted it, and so was 3rd enabled when majority wanted it.

This discussion started in the match arrangement with mdk vs est. Not between us, but by outsiders, who have all the right to comment this. So here is my request to let us play if nobody objects.


And if it's still a no, then let everybody who played their war in a modified-ammo server replay their wars :S? I mean that is unfair too then.

Edited by BariS, 16 March 2010 - 02:07 PM.

[XILLAX]

i agree, i think i would get 40 kills per side with extra ammo

but for serious i really do agree, 1sters need to shoot non stop and we can hardly ever find ak's since 3rders just sit with shotguns camping :DDDDD

[kays]

Agreed up there, I'm a 3rder but I run outta ammo pretty fast, due to blindness. So it would be a valuable call to add some clips!

[pummi]

baris, I removed extra clips from cst server cos I wanted our server to have right amount of bullets according to cup rules. tbh 120 bullets are more than enough, more than that just means there will be much more spraying. imo you need to know when to shoot and how much, there needs to be some flaws with wreckless spraying.