442 replies to this topic

[scatman]

im not saying it proves god. im saying the balance in science is proving more and more that a god(tons of things can be godlike to us, im nto talking about the childish vision of a physical god in this realm, it can be w/e) is likely to excist then that it doesnt.

if for example parallel universes excist then theres no doubt other inteligent beings excist of wich they maybe created us, then we will consider them god. now i dont believe in parrellel universe theory but this can almost be done with every theory. so every theory has blind spots in wich a god can be placed. therefor the balance of god or no god in science is proving more towards a god. its science itself.

lmao how did you reach that conclusion

[Activee]

im not saying it proves god. im saying the balance in science is proving more and more that a god(tons of things can be godlike to us, im nto talking about the childish vision of a physical god in this realm, it can be w/e) is likely to excist then that it doesnt.

if for example parallel universes excist then theres no doubt other inteligent beings excist of wich they maybe created us, then we will consider them god. now i dont believe in parrellel universe theory but this can almost be done with every theory. so every theory has blind spots in wich a god can be placed. therefor the balance of god or no god in science is proving more towards a god. its science itself.

I understood what you was saying. But so if parallel universes excist then why would there me no doubt, a superior intelligence should exist ? And so on, why would have they created us. I don't get this.

I mean , I think you take sciences discovers like they more tend to prove a god exist . But in my mind it doesn't tend to prove anything, neither it exist, neither it doesn't.

[maniman]

lmao how did you reach that conclusion

read whole post then. i explained why i came to that conclusion.

it might be hard for you to understand tho, if youre talking about god you are talking about crusades, so... yeahhh ... oke

[Activee]

so tell me, in what way the discover of adn tend to make believe a god exists. the discover of the big bang or w/e you have in mind.

[scatman]

read whole post then. i explained why i came to that conclusion.

it might be hard for you to understand tho, if youre talking about god you are talking about crusades, so... yeahhh ... oke

i did read your whole post and i mentioend crusades when doc posted that he hadn't seen an example of religion engendering violence.
SO YEAAHHHH OKE MISTER IDK HOW THIS WORKS SO IT MUST BE A SUPERNATURAL FORCE THAT NO ONE CAN SEE OR UNDERSTAND THAT WE WILL SOONER OR LATER FIND OUT

[maniman]

so tell me, in what way the discover of adn tend to make believe a god exists. the discover of the big bang or w/e you have in mind.

im not really getting youre question....... but yeah even the big bang theory has millions of things to question.. but the big bang theory is oldschool and most likely not true with all the new theorys out about the beginning of the universe.

[Activee]

I was just thinking that you was making non sense in your story : if there was a parralel universe there might be superior people in it who created us. That's not sciences at all, that's based on imagination because I can say:
if there was a parallel universe, there might be a Monster Spagetti wich created all of us. I don't know if you know what I mean.

http://en.wikipedia....aghetti_Monster

[maniman]

I was just thinking that you was making non sense in your story : if there was a parralel universe there might be superior people in it who created us. That's not sciences at all, that's based on imagination because I can say:
if there was a parallel universe, there might be a Monster Spagetti wich created all of us. I don't know if you know what I mean.

http://en.wikipedia....aghetti_Monster

yeah thats exactly what i mean lol. gj youre starting to get it, now read all over again

[Activee]

if for example parallel universes excist then theres no doubt other inteligent beings excist of wich they maybe created us, then we will consider them god. now i dont believe in parrellel universe theory but this can almost be done with every theory. so every theory has blind spots in wich a god can be placed. therefor the balance of god or no god in science is proving more towards a god. its science itself.

I didn't read all. But you can find a blind spot where a flying spagetti monster which created all of us too can be placed, don't you ?

I mean a blind spot where it COULD be doesn't prove it exist at all, neither it doesn't. It has just 0% of evidence in it. Because I can find blind spot for every craziest and unlogical theory.

Edited by Activee, 04 January 2011 - 05:33 PM.

[maniman]

I didn't read all. But you can find a blind spot where a flying spagetti monster which created all of us too can be placed, don't you ?

I mean a blind spot where it COULD be doesn't prove it exist at all, neither it doesn't. It has just 0% of evidence in it. Because I can find blind spot for every craziest and unlogical theory.

Well if you would take theory of the flying spaghetti monster seriously and take the theory into reality you need some imagination and look to whats more possible if the theory would be true. You maybe dont have evidence for it that doesnt mean its not possible, you still have to take it into consideration though. So unless you can debunk every blind spot in a theory you got yourself real truth. To bad every blind spot in a theory ends up with dozen more blind spots. So yeah, the balance of god and no god in science is leaning towards 'god'.

Edited by mani-tzu, 04 January 2011 - 05:38 PM.

[Activee]

just "no"

[maniman]

the spaghatti monster theory was created as a lesson for children functions as an eye opener to understand and philosophize about theories in the first place, you posted it yourself. now you are denying it.

*kicks you back to english class

[Activee]

the spaghatti monster theory was created as a lesson for children functions as an eye opener to understand and philosophize about theories in the first place.

That's what I am trying to do with you dude. don't worry

and my english is ok

Edited by Activee, 04 January 2011 - 06:50 PM.

[VARIMR]

philosophy is for normal life that, what masturbation is for sex life.

meaning of life.. some people think that it is continuing life making children, but theyre wrong. everything will come to a end some day, so continuing life is useless. true meaning of life is having fun and living your life fully, fuck the future. get children by accident while enjoying life but its an empty lottery ticket.

nice topic

[doctorfunk]

Kinda agree with that.
To me life seems meaningless so for me it's either living it fully enjoying it or getting depressed,
I guess I get little bit of both depending on my mood. I wouldn't feel good though messing up life for
others so there's a limit to my 'fuck it' attitude.

[Velox]

What is the topic atm? Wether love exists or not? Or still the existence of death?

[snugg]

dont know what the current topic is but all those who blindly believe in a god whether its in the context of christianity or islam or judaism, like a little kid that believes in santa, fuck off

[VARIMR]

AMEN

[R3NZ0]

dont know what the current topic is but all those who blindly believe in a god whether its in the context of christianity or islam or judaism, like a little kid that believes in santa, fuck off

true about that but it's becuz them being scared of dead so they want to believe theres something else to live for or w,e

Edited by R3NZ0, 05 January 2011 - 03:16 PM.

[VARIMR]

true dat. religious human is a weak human.